All democratic forces must invade political life. Ashot Pashinyan

Nikol Pashinyan's son Ashot Pashinyan made another post.

"We are not able to serve our agendas that every letter and word, we have a criterion for thinking about each orient.

It treats both inside or outside.

There are many reasons, but the most important thing is, in two layers, we are not sure to advance our agenda, to capitalize our own business, instead we are worried that it is unknown, or to any other understanding of us. In other layers, we often do not know the logic of our illustration, the logic logic of the course and the conceptual whole.

If what we say coincides with another person, we prefer to be silent, even when that agenda is of vital importance for the structure of our principle.

Under political conditions, all democratic forces must have a agenda, the society, the individual must have the opportunity to control their own lives. In addition, it is clear that the minimum form of its implementation is the electoral process and process.

Whoever agenda has, what political understanding and what agenda, discourse and policy will ad absolutely significant in ET conditions. It is essential if there are no solutions and commonalities in that layer, ourselves as a community of autonomy, self-sufficient decisions on their own life.

Democratic political forces must invade political life, with clear positions, expectations, demanding to separate the contradictions on self-knowledge and the need to have an autonomous, community-based life. And autonomous, community-based life means:

Possibility of expressing public opinion, political representation without:

- Straight capital, illegal, disproportionate involvement (electoral bribes, other ways, but token methods)

- Death, threat of terrorism.

The illegal role of capital in the elections still has an impact on the political environment.

We witnessed the real danger of terrorism, it was more pronounced than possible.

Was it possible to solve these problems by legislative, systemic means, but under the threat of marginal, death and destruction? There is an agenda on a universal agenda, the agenda of the self-sufficiency of TA communities, the possibility of managing their own lives, is an absolutely different question, which is not possible in the lack of lack of the first or vulnerability.

If there is no desire to organize, manage this life together, there will be no desire to organize that life, and the lack of that desire seems to be the result of skepticism of its own abilities.

The state is obliged to isolate the planner of terrorism, illegal capital management organizations and individuals from public and political life.

I support this agenda for democracy, ancient, revolutionary democracy, and I am not skeptical of what I will do as an individual.

All democratic forces have to involve their agenda on this issue or further political debates, and the debate may not be able to control our lives or not, but what way, on what kind of socially, and what is the principle of taxation, economical and social.

All forces are clearly positioned on this agenda, in one way or another, who protects at least minimal, electorate methods of democracy, are equal to me.

The state must release us from the danger of terrorism and disaster, political forces should be involved in such processes, also at least in the form of positions, publication, "he wrote.