The "Fact" daily writes:
"The signing of the document with the United States was, in fact, fixed certain results or desires recorded with Biden's administration.
This was done, realizing that in the case of Trump's administration, it may be very difficult, so it was an attempt to record everything possible at the moment.
The Armenian authorities remain adhering to their policy of changing the foreign policy vector, and the signing of this document with the United States, allegedly civic initiative and the construction of the agenda on it.
But in parallel with all this, global geopolitical changes are expected today, primarily due to the re-election of Trump, with its policy, "Hayatsk Analytical Center expert Anna Karapetyan told the Armenian authorities. to the foreign policy carried out by.
He notes, Trump stated and shows that there will be no interested involvement in the political process directly in different regions, to try to spread their own impact and so on.
"He will try to strengthen his position with more one's own neighborhoods and to take part in relations with the world.
This in turn means that the direct involvement of the United States in our region will not have the impact of Turkey as a representative of the West and NATO, to restore certain opportunities for Russia to restore its influence for the region, etc.
Therefore, this is the reason for Russia's urgency, restore its own positions and pressure on Armenia, which was followed by Pashinyan's telephone conversation with Putin and, in the same spirit, Ararat Mirzoyan's visit to Moscow.
The whole logic of the visit was that we are trying to resolve the existing problems, we are again constructive dialogue, Russia will have its involvement in all issues, and so on.
Moscow restores its position and shows the world that goes in that direction. What does the Armenian government do?
It always does the same thing, trying to extend its own power as much as possible to grow the pressure, and the side is in a hurry to go and try to restore their loyalty, and so on.
This manuscript is already witnessed very long, and, unfortunately, this is not a balanced foreign policy, but a reactionary foreign policy to respond to our national, state interests and only puts us in front of new challenges and problems. " proves he.
Charges, the CSTO and the EEU's thoughts, parallel with an enlarged meeting and a private conversation with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
It turns out that according to the expediency, the Armenian authorities continue to play on two cords. "Of course, yes. They did not even give up their manuscript, because it is a global course, you want to call it a course dictated by external actors, it is still an adopted course.
This government does not retreat from that course, as a matter of tactical, moment, as soon as the red lines are reacted than Moscow, they are in a hurry to resolve something with Moscow, but it does not mean that it does not mean that it does not mean that. They have a desire to normalize relations with Moscow, "our interlocutor emphasizes.
As many experts say, the signing of documents and agreements is one thing, but it is necessary to implement their life in reality.
The expert of "Hayatsk" analytical center presents some important emphases with the example of the document signed with the United States. "This document states our main problems and solves them, there is any response to Azerbaijan's policy and the demands set forward to Armenia, the political processes held in Baku, there is a question of occupation of Armenia's territories. Most importantly, there are security guarantees for Armenia, not in military experiences, classes, reforms, etc., other real security guarantees.
Today, Armenia, spoiling its relations with Russia, leaving the CSTO, etc., refuses, at least a very bad, even incomplete, but only external security guarantees.
Today, the West even hints at the level of that declaration document that it is ready to provide such guarantees.
No, he does not hint, therefore, even if this document is implemented, it will allow the United States to control or provide some information in terms of Armenia's borders, and it will continue to remove Russia from Armenia's energy sector and so on.
In a number of issues, it will provide an opportunity to promote its agendas, but instead will contribute to the protection of Armenia's interests. There are no important points for us in this document.
It is a completely different question of how much it will be implemented. It has been signed with a regime, today another regime has come, which has completely different agendas and goes to all the public zero, what did Biden do.
On the other hand, the status of this document is incomprehensible. Attempts by the Armenian authorities to present this as a historical document, which sets grounds for relations, but even in its name it is the regulations of the commission.
This is a document to be ratified or not, whether it is part of the legal field or not. There are a number of circumstances here, which call into question the legal force and political value of this document.
It is another thing that this is a desire declaration and does not have a reflection of our main interests, "he added.
Representatives of the ruling elite of Armenia have meetings and discussions with their international partners, performing from various tribunals, but do not even like a word about the "trials" taking place in Baku. "This is the policy adopted by the Armenian authorities," there is no Artsakh, there are no problems. "
Only Artsakh, which is part of our homeland, understands of Artsakh, the rights of Artsakh, the military-political leadership, etc., etc., to take. Even in that case, we do not see that constructive dialogue.
This is an adopted manuscript, not to refrain Azerbaijan, not to raise issues, only to promote peace agenda at all costs.
This is a tragic manuscript, the consequences of which we have seen since 2020. Today, our citizens are in Baku prisons, but the Armenian government does not take any process to ensure international consolidation and put pressure on Azerbaijan. The Armenian authorities are trying to comment on "if we talk, it will be worse by logic, but in reality we all understand it very well that it is not."
International organizations, representatives of the legislative and executive branch of different countries today are raising this issue, the Armenian authorities do not.
This will lead to the fact that soon after they will stop doing so, realizing that if Armenia does not need it, why should they need it?
Armenia should have been the beaten of the world's doors, the consolidative of all, the suppress of Azerbaijan. And if they do something and do it inappropriate, as they say, where is the result of what he has done? "Anna Karapetyan concludes.
Lusine Arakelyan
