The "Fact" daily writes:
"The Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of France to Armenia Olivie Dunkatini gave an interview to" Radiolur "and made a statement, which is at least weird if we don't say more. In fact, he said that Artsakh was "given to the former", still ... in 1991 with the Alma Ata Declaration. Literally. "Those who claim that Nagorno Karabakh have been part of Azerbaijan in 2022, they lie because Nagorno Karabakh has been recognized as part of Azerbaijan from the moment of the Alma Ata Declaration," he said.
Naturally, his statement, which is similarly repeated by Pashinyan's sling thesis, received a great response. Responsive figures stressed that Ambassador Dunkatinyin is either lying or unaware of the Artsakh issue, and the Alma Ata Declaration.
The moment of ignorance of the ambassador can be ruled in principle from the beginning. The diplomat appointed to Armenia cannot be unaware of the most vital question for Armenians. Second, no ambassador's self-statements, as a rule, do not. Third, France is a member of the OSCE Minsk Co-Chair, and representatives of his diplomatic corps should be informed about the negotiation process.
However, it is obvious that what the ambassador said is anti-logical with several very simple grounds. If Armenia, as he or her protected Pashinyan claims, Artsakh has recognized Azerbaijan's part, then the active military stage of the Artsakh conflict was about 1992-94, why did the NKR representative sign the ceasefire? The important thing as the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair, France was negotiating about 30 years over the issue of Artsakh, what status of Artsakh was discussed, finally why it was not the same France Referring to the piece of paper of Alma Ata, which has absolutely nothing to do with the Artsakh issue. We are sure that Ambassador Dunkotini knows all that it is not less wonderful.
In that case, why does he repeat Pashinyan's thesis? And why is it doing now? Many experts are convinced that Ambassador Divotini is not so protected by Nikol Pashinyan, as it may seem indefinite, but first of his country's president of Artsakh, Artsakh. In other words, it is a simple "nicole", with French motives, everyone is guilty, apart from me. By the way, when the same Makron was accused of Prague on the same Makron, he did not want that Pashinyan to recognize Artsakh in Azerbaijan, and in such conditions he could not do anything. "
In the most detailed newspaper in today's issue
