It is obvious that the RA Prime Minister is no longer a policy of refusing the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide, but a policy of denying the Armenian Genocide.
This is stated in the statement of the Central Office of the Armenian Cause.
"A few days ago, during a meeting with several members of the Swiss-Armenian community, the Armenian government has allegations that is unacceptable to the Armenian Genocide, which is nothing else than in Turkish denial thesis, which has been rejected not only for Armenia and all Armenians for decades. But also by the advanced international community, leading states, leading scientists, professional organizations, and even many Turkish intellectuals.
The falsification of the essence of the Armenian Genocide, the mitigation of the scale of the crime, the campaign against the internationalization of the Armenian Genocide and various other speculations, first of all, are an insult to the memory of the innocent victims. The reignable speeches of the Armenian government are also insulting for decades for decades for dozens of people who have struggled to recognize and denounce the recognition and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide.
It is obvious that the Armenian Prime Minister is no longer a policy of refusing to recognize the Armenian Genocide, but to deny the Armenian Genocide. , Reference to 1939 The lack of the term "genocide" or later in 1943-1944. Rafael Lemkin's creation of this term, which has become a need for Lemkin since 1921, significantly affected by Soghomon Tehleryan and describing what happened to the Armenians.
Moreover, according to Lemkin, a number of Armenian organizations and Armenian individuals have made a significant contribution to adoption of the Newly formed UN crime of genocide in 1948, and then, in ratification by various states.
If there was any sign of seriousness to Pashinyan, it may have been necessary to address the unique documentary and political work that the beginning of the World War and after the study of the Armenian massacres and preventing international popularization and prevention. Started in the 1890s. Since the Hamidian massacres, since the 19th century, even the Armenian Genocide, the Armenian Genocide and the local media were talking about the policy of extermination against Armenians in many European countries.
It was as a result of this struggle that the ARF Dashnaktsutyun was established in France, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, in the United States and elsewhere in international relations, which later became the ideological basis for the creation of the Armenian Cause system. .
During the next manifestation of the ignorance of semi-studies, Pashinyan tries to repeat what he said, "We have perceived" our history from abroad. It is that the Armenian people have begun to pursue the issue of internationalization of the Armenian Genocide in the Homeland, in the Tesilid Diaspora.
In the face of the first decades of the First Republic of Armenia, the work of the Armenian Genocide was focused on the return of the territories belonging to Armenia under international agreements in international law, especially since the United Nations was entered into force in 1952. Convention on Prevent and Punishment of Crime, when Turkey had had a new momentum from 1915-1923. The policy of denying crimes against humanity against the Armenians, the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide, also became a matter of the agenda of the Armenians.
It is obvious that the Armenian Prime Minister, who mainly relies on various power centers, feels the imminent danger of loss of their support, has begun to introduce allies in the hostile framework that, as mentioned above, has been rejected for decades. by a civilized world.
Different legal and / or medical assessments of Pashinyan's transition to the past six, but their loyalty to Armenians and Armenia can also be described in "Stockholm syndrome" (when the victim begins to have sympathy for the aggressor. , Stockholm Syndrome).
This possible explanation does not mitigate Pashinyan's crime against the Armenian state and state, but it emphasizes that Pashinyan is in the wrong place. Circle, in international relations, it has been positioned as a leader in the fight against genocide crime, significantly improving the international legal-political mechanisms of early announcement and prevention of this crime.
However, this and such statements of the Prime Minister of Armenia are also striking this work. It should be noted that such statements hinder the Armenian National Committee more than Azerbaijani provocations, hired lobbyists and anti-propaganda everywhere, "the statement said.
