"Fact" daily writes: "Pashinyan's propaganda has a stable thesis, the main idea of which is that whatever happens or does not happen in domestic political life is a struggle for power, with a primitive presentation and perception, a "chair fight". Naturally, in parallel with the current public awakening, the propaganda template that such and such a force and such an individual want to come to power has been put into circulation again. Its main leitmotif is to instill in people that what is happening is a "power struggle". Of course, after the removal of Nikol Pashinyan, a government must be formed. This is the classic logic of political science, politics and statehood. But... One can think that Armenia is a happy and problem-free country, that people "want to come to power".
In fact, what did Nikol Pashinyan, his CP and the 6 years of their rule make Armenia, what did they turn it into? In short, ruins. If we open up the description of ruins a little, then a mere brief enumeration is already telling. lost Artsakh, vulnerable security, destroyed defense and security systems, more than a hundred thousand Armenians deprived of their homeland, hundreds of square kilometers of territories under hostile control, bubble economy, huge debt of 12 billion dollars, failed foreign policy, house-breaking and earth-shattering domestic policy, uniformed " Bespredel."
In short, just ruins. Essentially, the issue of non-existence is on the table, and we have already left the classical political concepts and the classical political situation. And in such conditions, if there are people who are ready to take responsibility, then its main goal is to save the existing parts of the country and statehood. Moreover, after the six-year destruction of Pashinyan and CP, whoever comes to power will come under the heaviest burden. Figuratively speaking, the next government after these should be a "squad of executioners" (in the sense of self-sacrifice), it should act with that attitude to stop the decline first, and then start to get out of the current situation.
In practice, the next will be a government to "bring the state out of the ruins". So, when the Pashinyan propagandists talk about "seat fighting" or "seizing power", and some repeat it mechanically, it is worth asking a very calm, emotionless, sobering question. And to what state, to what day has the country been brought, that ruling it would be such a desirable thing?"
