RPA GM member Eduard Sharmazanov's Facebook post:
"Nikol Pashinyan still challenges Khorenatsi, Draskhanakertsi and the entire Armenian historiography.
Pashinyan has decided to challenge the entire Armenian historiography and says that after reading the new academic edition of Armenian History, he proposes to call it "History of Armenia" instead of "Armenians".
This is another ignorance of Nikol, because from Khorenatsi to the Institute of History of the National Academy of Sciences, our history is rightly called Armenian.
Armenian history has meant the history of Armenia and the Armenian people for millennia.
Therefore, Nicole's dilettantish theses are simply ridiculous.
Regarding history lessons:
Pashinyan states that studying history lessons led him to that idea and puts forward the false thesis of "real Armenia".
This is an absurdly stupid thesis, because if you say "real Armenia", then there is also "not real".
This is classic idiotism.
What, the Armenia of Hayk Nahapet, Artashes 1, Tigran Mets, Trdat 3, Mesrop Mashtots, Gagik 1, Aram Manukyan and Garegin Nzhdeh was not real?
Or was the third republic of RA not real?
Or is Erablur not real?
Yes, we must learn lessons from history, and the main lesson of history is as follows: in order to be respectful of the history of our country and people and to have statehood in the future, we must send the land-owning capitulant questioning the history of our country to the dustbin of history.
P.S. Dear fellow historians, talk about this and don't be afraid.
Otherwise, you may end up in the same dump with Pashinyan.
"History is cruel to those who forger and deny the history of their own country."
