"Fact" daily writes:
Pashinyan and his cronies, under the name of "internal party propaganda", are actually engaged in the most genuine pre-election campaign. Let's note that the RA Central Electoral Commission has approved the schedule of the elections to be held on June 7, according to which the period of pre-election campaigning begins on May 8 and ends on June 5 at 24:00. And that's it. And Nikol Pashinyan and CP have started campaigning two months before May 8, from the beginning of this month. Lawyers and many politicians consider this a gross violation of the law.
But that is only one side of the problem. During this campaign, one can say live, everyone sees a clear misuse of administrative resources, in addition to Pashinyan's misuse and abuse of his prime ministerial powers. For example, one place instructs not to appoint a specific person as the head of a kindergarten, which is beyond the scope of the prime minister's powers, in another place he gives a "dabro" to the head of an enlarged community to appoint a head of a settlement, which is also not within his powers. Plus, it makes various promises. If he acts as the chairman of the CP department, why does he appear in the "suit" of the prime minister?
If it's just an intra-party visit, why does he have meetings with other citizens while still wearing a prime ministerial "suit"? If the prime minister is visiting the marzes, why now, or why under the guise of intra-party propaganda and with 50 masked men? In short, all these controversies testify to one thing: Nikol Pashinyan started campaigning two months before the official start of the actual election campaign. Moreover, for its provision, by the way, police forces, employees and crews of other state bodies, local governments are involved.
And is that a law? If other political forces also come out for "intra-party propaganda", will law enforcement and other state bodies support them in the same way? Or vice versa? P.S.: By the way, we should note that CP propaganda posters are already hanging on the streets in some settlements. With what amounts, at whose expense, and even more so, why, we will discuss.
Details in today's issue of "Past" daily.
