"Fact" daily writes:
Recently, Nikol Pashinyan announced that "the forces led by the second and third presidents should not be in the next parliament." Well, one could say that he said something and move on. But in reality, there are serious dangers lurking beneath such a statement.
It is natural that the first reaction of many citizens to such a statement, even on social networks, was as follows. "And who are you to declare or decide such a thing?" No, really, again, who says such a thing?
In the voting booth, like the rest of us, a person with the right to only 1 vote, who, due to circumstances and "velvet", has already been in the position of RA Prime Minister for 8 years and has ruined Artsakh and Armenia.
Okay, Pashinyan is not the one who wants to be the president of the country, who is the prime minister, is it the people, is it the collective voice of all the voters of Armenia? The head of state is only one of about 2 million voters. So, no one, whoever he is, can decide for the people, RA citizens, who or which force should be in the parliament and which should not be.
If, of course, that person has no other wishes, and this statement is not a direct instruction before the elections. As for who will be in the parliament, the day will come, people will vote, it will be seen. In essence, Pashinyan's statement about who should be in the parliament and who should not be, from a certain point of view, is a serious violation of the fundamental principles of the RA Constitution and various laws.
On the other hand, Nikol Pashinyan's statements like this can indicate that he does not want to hold free and fair elections at all, and wants to paint such a picture that only those he needs will enter the parliament.
Hey, this is already the most interesting from the point of view of "people's bastion" theses...
Details in today's issue of "Past" daily
