The "Fact" daily writes:
Այս օրերին Սյունիքով անցնելիք ճանապարհի թեման շատ է քննարկվում։ It has been relevant because Azerbaijan has been able to "resolve" the Artsakh issue through the silent look of the international community and the depopularation of Armenians.
When the Armenian statehood operated in Artsakh, it was an obstacle to the implementation of the so-called "Zagzur corridor" program. And after "closing" the issue of Artsakh by Nikol Pashinyan, Turkey and Azerbaijan demand the so-called "Zangezur Corridor" from Armenia.
Although the November 9 trilateral statement said that the road passing in Syunik should pass under Russian control, but there is no word in the corridor document. However, since the November 9 document has lost its actuality, the issue of the road passing through Syunik and its status has already become a problem in the Armenian-Azerbaijani talks. First, Pashinyan left for Istanbul and met with the Turkish President, and before him, Ali visited Turkey to clarify the positions. Ապա Աբու Դաբիում երկկողմ ձևաչափով Փաշինյան-Ալիև հանդիպումը տեղի ունեցավ։ It is no coincidence that against that background, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed hope that a peace agreement will be signed soon between Azerbaijan and Armenia. It is clear that such statements do not happen exactly, and he had a concrete grounds to do so. But the most amazing is that the US Ambassador to Turkey Thomas Barack announces that Armenia and Azerbaijan are arguing around the 32-kilometer road. According to him, the United States offers 100 years to rent Armenia's part that it connects the territories of Azerbaijan to Nakhichevan. First of all, the question arises as to why the US Ambassador to Turkey made a statement on Armenia and Azerbaijan, and the United States could raise its proposals through its ambassadors to Yerevan or Baku. In fact, the submission of a proposal on the road through the US Ambassador to Turkey prompts the role of Turkey's growing role in the normalization of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations, as well as Ankara's beneficiary.
At the same time, Thomas Barack, who is a passing path, presents a dispute between two sides. Տպավորություն է ստեղծվում, թե վիճելի տարածքի հետ գործ ունենք։ In fact, there is no dispute, Syunik is part of Armenia's sovereign territory, and Nakhichevan is a result of the road connecting with Azerbaijan only the result of illegal and aggressive demands by Turkey and Azerbaijan. After all, Armenia has repeatedly stated that it is ready to provide a way, especially in terms of its control alone. But Turkey and Azerbaijan want the Armenian side not to reap the way. And why is that way so important? Azerbaijan can contact Nakhichevan and Turkey with both Georgia and Iran, especially since there are specific roads and railways under Georgia and Iran, and in the case of a road with Syunik. The question is not so far as the roads or infrastructures that the corridor will allow the Turkish-Azerbaijani tandem to be able to gain or occupy Syunik as long as Armenia is weak to implement Turkish-Azerbaijani integration and pan-Turkic programs.
It is another matter that the American side does not deepen in the historical, legal and geopolitical context of the topic and different nuances. Perhaps the current administration of the United States is trying to make progress in the Armenian-Azerbaijani talks as soon as possible that their efforts to establish peace have resulted in the government with promises to establish peace in the world. That's why Trump rushed to immediately announce that the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan approaches successful resolution. The problem is that in this context of secondary importance that one of the parties can force one of the parties to make it very painful and somewhat irreversible concessions. Իսկ տվ յալ դեպքում այդ կողմը Հայաստանն է։ Այստեղ գործ ունենք նաև Հայաստանի դիվանագիտական ջանքերի ակնհայտ ձախողման հետ։ Our diplomacy has not been able to make the American side the whole essence of the conflict and the deep layers. What does the sovereign state mean by rent and control?
It is no coincidence that this proposal in the Armenian domain was considered another step as a part of Armenia's sovereignty and territorial integrity. And there are grounds for such opinions, as it becomes obvious to the two-Armenian authorities related to this topic. On the one hand, they declare that Armenia has not discussed and not discussing the exercise of any third party, and on the other side of the Syunik road. օդանավակայանը, ջրի համակարգը, երկաթուղին, բջջային կապի օպերատորին։
The fact that the "corridor" does not hide, but the issue of lease (Rent) is at the end of the state, but the exercise is stored in the hands of the state, but the implementation process is entrusted to the private or stranger. Concession Management, when the state passes not only the function, but its right to its financial operation, often long-term, most often, without control levers, of course, the most important content. If the border controls not the state, but the sovereign functions become part of a trade agreement, no matter how much the authorities are drummer.
ԱՐՍԵՆ ՍԱՀԱԿՅԱՆ
