On the snowy day of April 2004, the rally of the opposition "Justice" faction of the National Assembly, after reaching the Republic Square and staying there for some time, was dispersed in the evening the rest decided to go home because it was cold and wanted to drink hot tea and come back the next day was surrounded by the police and there were very few people who came.
During the process of constitutional amendments in 2015, I was the only one (with the exception of Avetik Ishkhanyan) who said that we should be in favor of it, because it would lead to the disintegration of the imperial pyramid. Avetik was only in favor, because European countries, except France, are like that . governance is parliamentary. At that time, I was about to name a sergeant and even a traitor, but 4 years later, my opposition circle admitted that I was right.
Last year, I was in favor of participating in the Yerevan council elections, saying that it would not be out of place, despite the absolute refusal of my colleague from "Hraparak". , the real rating of the person holding the position of prime minister in the capital was revealed. And secondly, it is used repeatedly and successfully against the current government.
We have reached these days. When the CP "revolutionary" Hovik was born, I was in favor of it being widely used by the opposition, as it could lead to the removal of the current government I met again the same attitude that I have been used to for a long time. almost "чужой середи свойх" (a stranger among their own). But as if life confirms my rightness. At least, developments lead to it.
The first step was not to follow the "Whatsapp" request of the person clinging to the chair of the Prime Minister. The second step was not to give up the power of Nikol. The third step is to apply to the prosecutor's office, which is still ongoing. It once again reveals the illegal reality of Armenia. It is the unconstitutional dependence of the law enforcement system on one person. First, there is the fact that even if, as prime minister, Nicol had the right to access the investigative documents in some matters (although this is highly doubtful), he could not have the right to present them to others.
It is equivalent to the article in terms of which Nikolen is trying to make a criminal case against Aghazaryan. If the latter did not have the right to publish some information even unconsciously, then Nikol, who did the same thing consciously, did not have the right to do so. And if what Aghazaryan published was confidential was in power, and Nikolin in private. In the first case, the Pulitzer Prize is awarded (remember Watergate the story of the scandal), and in the case of the second one, he is sent to prison. In fact, once again it is proved that in terms of legitimacy, not democracy prevails. And this is what was characterized even in the ancient world. "What is allowed to Zeus is not allowed to the ox." Although where is Zeus, where is Nicole...
And finally, the most important result of Aghazaryan's ongoing history. it created such cracks in the power of one person that they will have an influence in the near future. People and especially the "backpackers" saw that the devil is not as scary as it seems. That you can go against Nicol and the world will not be destroyed. And the most important lesson, which, in my opinion, is still not realized. remaining a decent human being is more important than living well as a slave.
Vakhtang Siradeghyan
Material:hraparak.am:of
