Hovik Aghazarayan was the informant of "Hraparak", his Facebook accountwrote on the pageCP MP Vahagn Aleksanyan. In particular, he noted:
"I paused for quite a long time, but I think it's time to talk about this. Hovik Aghazaryan, who is now trying to get into the image of a victim or a victim for his libertarianism and dissent, was an informant for the "Hraparak" daily newspaper for a considerable period of time, from the faction's closed sessions and meetings with the Prime Minister.
This was actually confirmed by Aghazaryan and almost directly confirmed by the given media. What was the shame and sarcasm printed by "Hraparak" daily the day after Aghazaryan's removal was worth to the KP for removing a person like Aghazaryan? Of course, I understand this. Not a single mass media would want the hole for information leakage from the ruling faction to be closed. I don't even blame the media for using that leak hole.
By the way, I also have to record that when I found out that Aghazarayan was the informant of "Hraparak", I finally understood why "Hraparak's" details about the meetings of the faction crossed the boundaries of reality and reason in some places.
Anyway, let me say that transferring information from inside one's own team to the media of the obviously political opposite camp, weaving various intra-team intrigues in this way, not even saving the highly sensitive information given during closed meetings with the Prime Minister, I think has one characteristic, which I will not include in this post.
And Aghazaryan's half-hearted comments about some chatter selectively in order to complete his status as a "victim" are simply ridiculous.
Those chats are of little interest to me personally, although I must record that Aghazaryan is extremely selective in his actions of publicizing those chats.
As for Hakob Aslanyan, it turned out that the same applies to Hovik Aghazaryan, because the latter chose the second option between the faction and the leak of information from the faction."
