Armen Hovasapyan writes:
"The internal political developments taking place these days, which are mainly related to the resignations of the people leading the power bloc, are a topic of wide public discussion. everyone has become an "expert" and "expert" and tries to interpret what happened in their own way. However, it was not a spontaneous operation, but rather a deep and long-planned operation, but let's focus on one of them.
Yesterday, in one of the news channels, I caught the eye of the interview of Daniel Ioannisyan, the head of the "Union of Conscious Citizens" NGO, and actually a specialist in all changes in RA, where I came across several remarkable episodes. Daniel, beating his chest, defended Argishti Kyaramyan, specifically stating:
"I regret that Argishti Kyaramyan was fired, because he was doing quite good work in the Investigative Committee, he was implementing radical changes that we don't see in other power structures."
This is being said about a person under whose leadership dozens of opposition political figures were "stitched" on artificial, fake cases, people were illegally taken into custody, many, Armen Ashotyan in particular, continues to remain under house arrest (although Ashotyan's case, as you can see it collapses in court).
Basically, what happens? Ioannisyan, who throughout his career has been seen by the public as a "democracy flag bearer", a person who considers himself to be the "number one human rights defender" in RA, actually closes his eyes to the violence and tortures that have been talked about for a long time by various people. individuals and news media.
Ioannisyan very nicely bypasses the hundreds of cases not revealed and investigated by the Investigative Committee, the incident that fell through the window of the Investigative Committee, etc.
Ioannisyan, who has been operating entirely with Soros grants, now comes and foams at the mouth to express his support to Kyarmyan, saying that "he is the most uncorrupted of the leaders of the power system" (by the way, serious doubts arise here, it means that Daniel has concerns about the rest).
The reason is very simple. Daniel, the "beloved" of the US Embassy, very calmly and openly defends another "beloved" of the embassy, Kyaramyan. By the way, the trace of the West in this topic becomes more obvious and sharp when Ioannisyan emphasizes in his speech that:
"He brilliantly led the National Security Service until the Russians demanded and Pashinyan fired Kyaramyan because the Russians did not like what Kyaramyan was doing in the National Security Service."
PS Before I wrote my text, it became clear that another "beloved" of the West, Arpine Sargsyan, was appointed Minister of Internal Affairs.
