RA First President Levon Ter-Petrosyan writes:
"Today, on the website of" Hraparak ", I carefully read the extensive article of historian Vahagn Hakobyan on the occasion of the terms on the terms" Armenian History "and" History of Armenia "so far. The name "Armenian History" has never been politically investigative not by state officials, nor historians, as it is a history of the Armenian people and as Armenian.
In that case, of course, the question arises as to why and how the debate on it was born. The answer is very simple, in general, the famous person who does not know any ideas of the Armenian history and the most important of the Armenian history, Nikol Pashinyan, after the crushing and humiliating defeat of Azerbaijan. Let me remind you that in a joint interview with Aliyev years ago, Pashinyan was proud of the reality of Tigran the Great. It was difficult to imagine a more pronounced and embarrassing manifestation of the provincialism.
The motif of the mentioned article to please Pashinyan's understandings is not worth referring to it, of course. His partner historians have already responded to this issue. "
