I watched Karen Andreasyan's interview. First of all, let me say that the interview is not just an ArmComedy piece, but a separate stand-up can be staged based on it, but let's leave that to the professionals.
Hayk Mamijanyan, head of the NA "I have honor" faction, wrote about this on his Facebook page.
According to him, Karen Andreasyan probably "sucked moisture" from Nikol Pashinyan's picture and gave excuses like "I am responsible, but not guilty" when answering almost all questions.
"The judiciary has published a shameful political propaganda film, in which the subjugation of the judiciary by today's rulers is clearly visible, and Andreasyan says that he commissioned it to be made, but it has nothing to do with him.
He says: "Instead of a report, this time I asked him to make a film." It is not so good, after this publish the decisions of the Central Committee in the form of a cartoon or a rap video.
I won't even touch on the fact that he is constantly pointing arrows at Gagik Jhangiryan and other presidents of the Central Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan, saying that the judicial system is half-ruined. The lies about the non-functioning electronic registration system are separate stories.
He says, "in the case of 80% of court cases, the system of electronic notation works", but it comes down to the cases of opposition politicians and, in particular, the cases of examination of arrest petitions, we do notation by hand.
It turned out like this completely by chance, aren't we the ones who ascribe the cases made against almost all oppositionists to the judges who obediently execute the orders of the government?
It has nothing to do with the fact that during Serzh Sargsyan's administration, this system was introduced and worked continuously, increasing the level of independence of the judiciary.
In short, I was informed that Karen Andreasyan, when she was a minister, was very upset that I called one of the bills she brought to the National Assembly "an essay of a law student with mediocre progress" (perhaps old traumas were rearing their head). Let me say that Andreasyan regressed and recently at best, his interview can be compared to a low-quality humorous miniature presented during "Student Spring".
Such a bad quality that if they had introduced me during my years as a student advisor, I definitely would not have included it in that program," Mamijanyan wrote.
