The "Fact" daily writes:
It was recently announced that all points of the "Peace Treaty" were agreed. The Armenian government offered Azerbaijan to reach an agreement on further discussions.
Azerbaijan is in no hurry to sign the document, on the contrary, continues the chain of its demands.
International expert, Member of the Hayaker Initiative Menua Soghomonyan says that the document is not public, we are not familiar with the text, we can't do very specific observations.
"But when we look at the overall content, the image can record a few things. First, there is no absolute Armenian agenda here, there is no record of the main object of the "Peace Agreement".
This is the most important thing. The object of "Peace Treaty", in fact, should be the Artsakh conflict, that is, what is the reason for the lack of diplomatic relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan?
The Republic of Armenia has been supported by the right to self-determination of Artsakh for decades, and Azerbaijan has violated it, and the conflict has arisen.
The Name of Nagorno Karabakh in the "Peace Agreement" does not exist the topic of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh, that is, the main issue that concerns Armenia-Azerbaijan relations is not addressed.
Second, the advantages that Azerbaijan gained against the Republic of Armenia in this period, instead of which Armenia benefits, which interests of Armenia are satisfied?
There is nothing about it. For example, there are no so-called Azerbaijani captives, but there are 150,000 refugees from Artsakh, and their return is not yet fixed, maybe it is left to Azerbaijan's goodwill. And who will go to the Azerbaijani flag of Artsakh, the observation of an Azeri police officer or an officer?
On the other hand, the security guarantees should not be the third party, the country's troops should not be. This is a serious violation in terms of the sovereignty of the Republic of Armenia. The sovereignty of each state also applies to the fact that this state can cooperate with third countries in ensuring its security.
This cooperation can also be deploying military contingent of those countries in its territory.
When such content is stated that there should be no troops in the third country, this is a rough violation of sovereignty. According to our information, this content is in the draft document. So much is enough to say that this is not a peace agreement, but another capitulation of Armenia in the sense of the guarantee, excluding another Azerbaijani aggression, "Soghomonyan told" the fact ".
He reminds that the refusal of the lawsuits against Azerbaijan on international platforms will be a very difficult blow, because one of those lawsuits, for example, refers to the return of the people of Artsakh. "The UN International Court of Justice obliged Azerbaijan to ensure the safe and dignified return of the people of Artsakh, and now the Republic of Armenia refuses.
The name puts a mutual refusal, and it is a fake, because Azerbaijan's lawsuits against the Republic of Armenia have given it some basis for Azerbaijan's recognition of Azerbaijan.
This is one of the regular crimes of this government. In the future, it would be possible to prevent the Azerbaijanis involve us in artificially involved in legal processes. The mutual resignation of the lawsuits is a fact that the people of Artsakh on the process of returning to his homeland, "our interlocutor said.
It is believed that even after the change of government, politicians, diplomats will be very difficult to change the situation, because the current government is presenting our country on a day of irreversibility.
"With such activities, they create a lot of problems for the future. The current regime is trying to solve the preservation of its government, keeping its government's maintenance of Azerbaijan's failure to implement new aggression.
The implementation of new aggression by Azerbaijan may threaten their authority, in the end, they deceived the people so much, as a result, so many losses in Azerbaijan.
They said that it guarantees the territorial integrity of the Republic of Armenia and so on. But in fact, these concessions are done first of all to enter the Turkish protectorate and guarantee their government.
This creates a very difficult situation, a situation forces to be guided by national interests in the future, to set our interests to the right of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to initiate relevant legal processes, etc.. "
Nikol Pashinyan continues to talk about real and historical Armenia, saying that it is now building a real Armenia. In order to build a real Armenia, in his opinion, we must refrain from all historical values, we see encroachments on Artsakh, the Armenian Genocide and a number of other important topics.
How is the thesis called "real Armenia"? "The danger is that we stop being a national state, the" real Armenia "concept is not a national state and just a state of being a weak state. The goal of the "real-Armenian" is to ensure the welfare of the people, more emphasis on the economic meaning, and if the Armenian people are so important, its historical memory, because there are conditions for the historical memory, for example, it is encouraged by the emigration of the Armenian people abroad. The issues of national dignity are more acute, they can simply remain here, endure.
The important issue is why we live in Armenia, why should we live and create in Armenia? If your state is not a national state, it does not emphasize the publication of your national identity, it refuses to take the birthplace from one part of our people, the refusal to return this idea, overwhelmed, makes us lamb's wolf in the hands of lamb. As a result, people will change psychology, identity, they will no longer confront any more difficulty and prefer to escape from reality.
The danger is that the formation of a materialistic society is based on such an international situation, it will be continuously divided, it will be reduced, it will weaken, and eventually it will be completed, "Menua Soghomonyan concludes.
Lusine Arakelyan
