Yerkir.am:writes:
On February 12, the sitting of the Scientific Council of the Faculty of History and the Heads of the World History and the Chair of History and theory of the Faculty of History and theory of the Faculty of History, which could have expressed public interest.
The point is that the only candidate for the head of the Chair of World History was the author of the infamous textbook of the 7th grade of the "Armenian History" school subject, the co-author of the 8th grade textbook of the same subject. What anti-falsificent and anti-Armenian methods have been used by the author's methods, and what kind of powerful criticism of Smbat Hovhannisyan was well known by the whole historical community, everyone is known.
However, in the context of Pashinyan's government against Armenia and the Armenians, Smbat Hovhannisyan has been trying to nominate such important positions in the university sphere. It is clear to everyone what for what. Let's prove that Rector Hovhannes Hovhannisyan was personally present at the sitting of the Academic Council, voted and left the session.
But, as the folk word says, your affiliate vinegar. Summary of the voting results found out that Smbat Hovhannisyan received 16 votes in favor, 17 against and was not elected to the head of the chair, as it was necessary to have 21 votes in favor.
Another failure took place in the case of the election of the Head of the Chair of History and theory of Armenian Art. One of the candidates was Zaruhi Hakobyan, who wrote with Smbat Hovhannisyan the 8th grade textbook of "Armenian History". It should be reminded that this was the same textbook where the connection of Eastern Armenia in 1828 was presented to the Russian Empire as the coverage of which made a lot of noise. On August 15, even the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement on this head of the textbook, emphasizing that the book is distorted by the events of the 18th century and the early 19th century. Only this passage was changed.
As a result of the hot session of the Academic Council, it turned out that Zaruhi Hakobyan did not win. The latter received 19, and the other candidate, and the acting leader of the same chair, and the leader of the same chair, now the leader of the chair (the latter established the Chair of 1996) received 17 votes.
According to our information, all this spoiled the mood of some and mix the cards.
Details:Site:
