Euromedia24 on Play Store Euromedia24 on App Sore
BNB

$694.57

BTC

$94615

ADA

$0.89204

ETH

$3354.19

SOL

$186.87

1 °

Yerevan

0 °

Moscow

18 °

Dubai

6 °

London

-2 °

Beijing

2 °

Brussels

10 °

Rome

8 °

Madrid

BNB

$694.57

BTC

$94615

ADA

$0.89204

ETH

$3354.19

SOL

$186.87

1 °

Yerevan

0 °

Moscow

18 °

Dubai

6 °

London

-2 °

Beijing

2 °

Brussels

10 °

Rome

8 °

Madrid

The perception of the state "as a tool for earning bread", Nikol Pashinyan's "solution" is unfortunately not new in practice. political scientist


Political scientist Hakob Badalyanwrites:

The perception of the state "as a tool for earning bread", the formula "provided" by Nikol Pashinyan is unfortunately not new in practice.

Simply, based on a number of subjective circumstances, Pashinyan allows himself to use it for informational and propaganda reasons.
In practice, the "resolution" was also the basis of the system that governed until 2018, de facto. State life activities have only served the logic of "earning bread" or "keeping a house", nothing more. Yes, the dominant elites at practically all levels in Armenia, both officials and various socio-political actors, have been guided by the philosophy of "keeping a house".

All that was done under loud and pathetic expressions, but the actual reality did not change. That was the standard of thinking and psychology of the Armenian elites. If it were not so, the situation would not have reached 2018. That philosophy has now simply become more cynical and relaxed, more open.

And the reason is that the "resolution" has been deeply embedded in public psychology and thinking for a long time. And, as painful as it may be to admit, that is how the public perceives the idea of ​​the state and statehood. Pashinyan feels this very well and knows that he is voicing the "resolution".

In general, in my opinion, it is a misunderstanding to think that he is voicing unpopular opinions and thoughts in public. He is voicing what he is sure will be digested in the "gastrointestinal system" of public consciousness. That is why I note that this system must be changed in Armenia. , in order to change the government and management system, if we are talking about change from within Armenia.

More News

...

We start the year in positions and end in the same place. Tigran Abrahamyan

2.5 years have passed, but Pashinyan has not published any documents. With Charmazan

For RA, the "peace agreement" is not a guarantee of security. Armen Ayvazyan

Avinyan's father's facial expression, tone of voice and look were much more expressive

The political power cannot belittle the exceptional role of the Holy Apostolic Church. Tatoyan

All this is not even funny anymore. it is a tragedy. political scientist

This debate would have meaning and value if it started in 2018 or at least before losing Artsakh, why Pashinyan didn't do it? Hovhannisyan

When a person's head is full of garbage instead of a brain, stupid decisions are born. Arthur Khachatryan

I think you feel your end coming, miscarriage. Ruben Hakobyan

Pashinyan, who finds an elegant answer to all questions, also found this "cutie". Sevak Hakobyan

Religious symbols are returning in politics. political scientist

In the conditions of the criminal inaction of the RA authorities, Azerbaijan shows territorial ambitions towards different regions of the RA. Abrahamyan

A picture causing incomprehensible emotions. Christina Vardanyan

Pashinyan, who recognizes Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan, will have something to say, I will apply to the prosecutor's office. Mesrop Arakelyan

The ruling couple has decided to fill the entire vacuum in the country. Armine Ohanyan

Nikol Pashinyan should also invite Borel, Charles Michel, Emmanuel Macron to a debate. Ghazaryan

Presidents speak not when someone needs it, but when they need it. Lika Tumanyan

Nikol wakes up every day with the stigma of our five thousand soldiers and the gravedigger of Artsakh on his forehead. Levon Zurabyan

The one who ideologically considers Artsakh to be Azerbaijan gave a self-confessed testimony. Tigran Abrahamyan

It is not the three former presidents who should go to the meeting with Pashinyan, but the investigators. Edgar Ghazaryan