Hrant Bagratyan writes on his Facebook page: “Yesterday I was watching a debate organized by Petros Ghazaryan and a young woman on the topic of raising the local tax for half an hour.
Two people representing the state’s positions (from the financial and tax system) were developing a thesis that if the business entity documents everything, the tax increase will not be so significant for them.
After all, they said, this is a transitional stage (all transitional stages be damned). Everyone will soon have to switch to a “normal” tax system (i.e., pay VAT, profit tax, etc.). And there was a person who represented the small business association and timidly said that all this is wrong.
What is the problem here?
1. In 2012-2013, the local tax was introduced as a more progressive and easier form of taxation.
2. There is no need to set a lower tax rate in the absence of a document.
This is a state bribe and contradicts the ideology of the State Budget. Indeed, if we look at the producer-seller logistics chain, each link gives its share to the State Budget, then what is the problem with documentation?
In addition, the state raises taxes 2-3 times and then gives a small discount. This is not a form.3. The further development of the tax system is associated with the gradual transition of the entire economy to the State Budget.
Without it, there will be no innovation and AI.
After watching for 30 minutes, I turned off the TV.
How pitiful is Petros Ghazaryan, begging for the head of state's favor.
How pitiful are the poor bureaucrats who are struggling to keep their jobs?
