"Fact" daily writes:
As a result of the elections held in the USA, Donald Trump became the president.
What developments in geopolitical relations and conflicts can be expected as a result of these elections, and what impact can they have on our region?
Political scientist Aghvan Poghosyan's analysis for "Fact" revolves around these and other topics. "Perhaps, we witnessed the most dramatic struggle for the seat of the US president in history.
Trump's previous fight with Biden in 2020 and his showdown with Hillary Clinton in 2016 do not compare.
Back at the start of his election campaign, Trump voiced an ambitious initiative to end the conflict in Ukraine (allegedly, the plan envisages a cessation of hostilities along the contact line, the creation of a demilitarized zone, and Ukraine's non-aligned status).
That is why in Kiev, great hopes were attached to the victory of Kamala Harris, who promised to support Zelensky's regime with money and weapons.
Trump's triumphant return to the Oval Office and Republican control of both houses of Congress means the foreign policy vector will be drawn by the Republican Party.
Republicans fundamentally understand that Ukraine is doomed to lose the war.
The newly elected Vice President of the USA, James Vance, has repeatedly stated in public that Washington should not waste its forces and resources on Ukraine.
In his opinion, which is shared by the majority of the Republican Party, the United States should prepare for a duel with China. That is why the new administration of the White House will seek to agree with the Kremlin in order to exclude the active participation of Moscow in a possible conflict between the PRC and the United States.
Trump is expected to put an end to the Kiev regime's incompetent spending on a senseless war against Russia.
The Zelensky regime will cease to exist in a matter of days if Washington completely stops supporting Kiev. The US and its allies have more than once left their puppets to the whims of fortune when their geopolitical plans failed. This is how the project called "Mikhail Saakashvili" was thrown into the dustbin of history.
The president of Georgia, who had believed the promises of his Western friends about a "bright European future", unleashed a war against South Ossetia with the aim of eliminating the territorial issue for early NATO membership.
The decisive actions of the Russian army did not allow this bloody adventure to be crowned with success.
The Georgian people have seen through their difficult experience how expensive the foreign political intrigues of the country's leadership can be.
Taking into account past mistakes, the Georgian government has developed a sovereign foreign policy course that corresponds to the national interests of the state and its people.
As for Vladimir Zelensky, the fate remains unenviable. In the near future, his regime may be deprived of the financial, military and political patronage of the United States.
The EU countries, which have long lost geopolitical subjectivity, do not have the capabilities of the military-industrial complex that can replace military aid from the United States.
The Georgian and Ukrainian scenarios show the danger that flirting with Western bullets poses to the well-being of the peoples of those countries.
At this moment, our country stands at a geopolitical crossroads.
Changes in the foreign policy course or similar initiatives by the rulers of Armenia are fraught with the consequences of the Ukrainian scenario."
