I consider the talk about concessions to be especially unacceptable, because if the RA state border, the de jure existing border, is reproduced, it is at least not logical to call it a concession. RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said about this during the National Assembly-Government question-and-answer session, referring to CP faction deputy Arpine Davoyan's concern that there has been a lot of talk about unilateral concessions recently: "It is at least not logical to call it a concession, I would call it at least a success, because RA for the first time in its history, it independently forms a border through negotiation, creates, reproduces a border and lays an important cornerstone for the further development of Armenia's sovereignty, statehood, and independence. Why do I say that we reproduce the border, because in 1991, according to In essence, by joining the Alma Ata Declaration or signing the Alma Ata Protocol of the Minsk Agreement, RA has once again declared itself that it is getting an independent state on the territory of the third republic, that is, Soviet Armenia, on the borders of Soviet Armenia, and the Alma Ata Declaration has recorded the borders inviolability. As of 1991, there were de jure borders between the ASSR and the ASSR, and during this time we worked, we raised all the de jure grounds for the existence of that border, we made sure that we know the legal border of the RA where it passes, and we reproduced that border on the ground, adopting (there is no alternative) the principle "the border passes where it passes". The sovereign territory of RA is fully recorded with demarcated parts," he said.
For the first time in its history, RA is forming a border independently through negotiation. Pashinyan
22.05 18:12 |
Category
Politics
