Armenia and Azerbaijan recognized each other's territorial integrity according to the administrative borders that existed between the Soviet republics at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union, that is, the borders of Armenia correspond to the borders of the ASSR, the borders of Azerbaijan correspond to the borders of the ASSR. Therefore, we cannot draw new borders because there is no need to draw new borders. The new border is the same as the old border at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union. Ruben Rubinyan, deputy speaker of the National Assembly, said about this at the session of the National Assembly on May 21, referring to the criticism of the opposition: "When we say that we are re-creating the border, we mean that in the process of demarcation we are restoring, re-establishing the existing administrative borders between the Soviet republics. ", he said. Addressing the opposition's criticism that maps from different years are used as a basis in the demarcation process, Rubinyan clarified. "The basis of demarcation in this area is the 1976 GSH map, which in turn is based on the 1969 border. When you say documents from 1988, it gives the impression that there is some new map that is much more favorable to us. There are no big differences between the maps of the Soviet period and the late period." According to Ruben Rubinyan, the Armenian side tried a logic for decades that did not bring good results. we have lost territories, victims. He also rightly considered that none of the compromise or compromise options available at various stages contained sufficient guarantees, but as a result "we always got the worst option". means that we should not do anything, it means that we should create those guarantees with our actions. And we are doing exactly that with this process, we are creating those guarantees," said Rubinyan.
There are no big differences between the maps of the Soviet period and the late period. Ruben Rubinyan
21.05 17:52 |
Category
Opinions
