The "Fact" daily writes:
Prior to the CPF, the first reading was received by the IAEA, the head of the CPF threaten to take revenge, to all employees of ENA, who will take part in rallies. Pashinyan also threatened that "those who force the employees to participate in the rallies will be judged." To say that the threats of the rating Pashinyan are illegal, it will mean not to say anything. The first. Pashinyan's statement grossly violates citizens, political views, demonstrations, rallies, the constitutional rights of speech and opinion and international norms guaranteeing those rights. No matter how much his job, Pashinyan, he packed his job all day, he packed all this with the wording "they are busy with political intrigues", the meaning of it does not change. What did he know about the intrigues? It is already "political intrigue" or participating in the action. Do you see what the events of 2018 with that logic were? Second. Pashinyan talks about imposing a rally.
Where is the evidence of it, how does he (or in general) to find out or substantiate that "compulsion" in about 7,000 employees? In general, people are free, according to their beliefs, to participate in any peaceful rally, express their protest and disagreement. Third. What does the Prime Minister's intervention mean to the labor relations of the private, non-state enterprise, the threat of special, employment?
The Prime Minister who became the right to hold the employees of the private company that it is still convinced that the ENA has already taken the relevant legislative changes, moreover, the "shoe" can be passed through international lawsuits. Fourth. What does the threat of being judged mean? In other words, Pashinyan has a confession that actually judges himself, not the courts.
In other words, he said that he had turned his will in a word. The disgrace of threats did not diminish.
In addition, different public and political circles have been expected to have some expectations from June 17, but the observations in social platforms are not really a serious political application and will not contain elements of domesticism and no new cause of frustration.
