Nicole made two people, her and R., on March 1. Kocharyan's theme. Vahe Hovhannisyan, a member of the "Alternative Projects" group, wrote about this on his Facebook page.
"The government again brought the subject of March 1 to the court. artificially, with difficulty, but persistently. The problem is to once again sell this emotional topic to our society, which is tired and stunned by the harsh reality. Of course, it doesn't sell well this time. Against the background of the war, the lost Artsakh and new extreme threats, there is no previous resonance. Nicole made two people, her and R., on March 1. Kocharyan's topic. When he needs to, he attacks, and the other is forced to defend himself. Actually, this is not the topic of both of them at all, this is the topic of society, which, however, no longer has the "appetite" for complex topics.
If society does not demand to understand why, how March 1 was possible in its country, in its city, why it was not prevented, what mechanisms worked, why such an atmosphere was formed, it means that the society can be calmly forced to digest any disaster, for example, the fact of not stopping the war soon. If the society was demanding and if its elites were a little more honest, then many things in the country could have a different course. Now, do we really think that there can be such a judge who can give answers to all those questions by holding court sessions?
Updating the March 1 theme today, however, also means:
1. It is offensive to the victims and their relatives. The government simply tells them: when I want to wake up the topic, when I want to put it to sleep, you are just a group of beneficiaries for me.
2. It is a message to vulgarly simplify complex topics. take all difficult topics that way. Zero attempt to understand the deep reasons of anything, the mechanisms of "never again".
3. Extremely dangerous use of the judicial system. It is a very dangerous thing and it will end badly for many people," wrote Hovhannisyan.
