Tigran Khachatryan wrote on his Facebook page:
"Let's accept that Vazgen Sargsyan and Karen Demirchyan were killed because they opposed the exchange of Meghri for Lachin. Aram Sargsyan directly claims that it was a Russian plan, which Kocharyan and Sargsyan were not against. Let's accept that it is so. One question remains unanswered. If the obstructionists (Vazgen Sargsyan, Demirchyan) were removed, and the supporters remained (Kocharian, Serzh Sargsyan), then why did they not implement that plan later? Wasn't there an obstacle anymore?
Aram Sargsyan probably did not notice that in the end it was Nikol Pashinyan, not Kocharyan and Sargsyan, who signed the Russian plan on November 9, by which he got the Lachin Corridor, instead committing to open communications connecting the western regions of Azerbaijan to Nakhichevan. It turns out to be a kind of mixed story. Hordors Vazgen Sargsyan's brother or those interviewing him. Answer the following two questions
1. Why did Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan not implement the Russian plan to replace Meghri with Lachin after killing Vazgen Sargsyan and Karen Demirchyan, if they were in favor of it? Was Aliyev against it? If Aliyev was against, then did Aliyev, Vazgen Sargsyan and Karen Demirchyan have the same point of view?
If not, how to explain it?
2. How did it happen that Nikol Pashinyan signed the plan in the end, and then flew away from it, handing over Artsakh for good, but still not escaping from giving Zangezur corridor. Aliyev has not given up on that demand. As long as there is no exhaustive answer to these two questions, everything else is not convincing and illogical. I hope that somehow it will happen.
P.S. I have no desire to justify Ter-Petrosyan, Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan. But as a citizen of the Republic of Armenia, I am only interested in the truth. I am not concerned about who wanted to do what, I am concerned about who did what."
