Euromedia24 on Play Store Euromedia24 on App Sore
BNB

$689.88

BTC

$95439

ADA

$0.860826

ETH

$3320.19

SOL

$188.68

-2 °

Yerevan

0 °

Moscow

18 °

Dubai

6 °

London

-4 °

Beijing

5 °

Brussels

12 °

Rome

8 °

Madrid

BNB

$689.88

BTC

$95439

ADA

$0.860826

ETH

$3320.19

SOL

$188.68

-2 °

Yerevan

0 °

Moscow

18 °

Dubai

6 °

London

-4 °

Beijing

5 °

Brussels

12 °

Rome

8 °

Madrid

This debate would have meaning and value if it started in 2018 or at least before losing Artsakh, why Pashinyan didn't do it? Hovhannisyan


We have a more important debate about the future at stake. Convinced that the remote "debate" between the current prime minister and former presidents should not be limited to the four of them, I am formulating the main points that are of interest to hundreds of thousands of people.

1. This debate would have meaning and value if it started in 2018 or at least before Artsakh was lost. Why didn't Pashinyan do that?

2. Has Nikol Pashinyan discussed or at least debated with former presidents?

a. When he announced in Artsakh the day after his election that he could not negotiate on behalf of Artsakh.

b. When he announced that he was starting the negotiations from scratch, rejecting the decades-long negotiation process,

c. When he made unbalanced provocative statements (Artsakh is Armenia and that's it), he organized demonstration parties in Shushi. When he could not (or did not want to) prevent war with possible diplomatic tools

e. When he refused the proposals to end the war early and caused enormous losses and human casualties, which could have been avoided.

f. When he accepted in Prague that Artsakh is a part of Azerbaijan

g.  When during the 9-month blockade of Artsakh, he could not (or did not want to) find solutions that existed.

All these questions have one answer: no. He did not consult, did not "debate" in any of these stages. Made SOLE decisions. Maybe those decisions were influenced by the members of a small group known to him, who are still in the same government as him.

Those SINGLE decisions led to a historic disaster. If you didn't do it at the necessary moments, what debate now, about what? And the last most important question.

Why did Nicole artificially start the debate topic? Taking into account our previous bitter experience, we can assume that he is going to take Armenia to a new big test in the near future. It can be either new major concessions to Aliyev, or a new phase of escalation of relations with Russia, which will lead to serious security and economic problems.

We don't know his next SINGLE plans. One thing is clear that at this stage of his administration, he is going to turn Armenia into a chaotic environment where all sick thoughts and false debates can become possible, distracting from important and real agendas.

For the sake of that chaos, he can even sacrifice many members of his political team in order to serve the media. And this is why we have more important things to do than the present-past "debate". Our actions, our actions should be for our real future.

Vahe Hovhannisyan

Alternative projects group

More News

...

The political power cannot belittle the exceptional role of the Holy Apostolic Church. Tatoyan

All this is not even funny anymore. it is a tragedy. political scientist

When a person's head is full of garbage instead of a brain, stupid decisions are born. Arthur Khachatryan

I think you feel your end coming, miscarriage. Ruben Hakobyan

Pashinyan, who finds an elegant answer to all questions, also found this "cutie". Sevak Hakobyan

Religious symbols are returning in politics. political scientist

In the conditions of the criminal inaction of the RA authorities, Azerbaijan shows territorial ambitions towards different regions of the RA. Abrahamyan

A picture causing incomprehensible emotions. Christina Vardanyan

Pashinyan, who recognizes Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan, will have something to say, I will apply to the prosecutor's office. Mesrop Arakelyan

The ruling couple has decided to fill the entire vacuum in the country. Armine Ohanyan

Nikol Pashinyan should also invite Borel, Charles Michel, Emmanuel Macron to a debate. Ghazaryan

Presidents speak not when someone needs it, but when they need it. Lika Tumanyan

Nikol wakes up every day with the stigma of our five thousand soldiers and the gravedigger of Artsakh on his forehead. Levon Zurabyan

The one who ideologically considers Artsakh to be Azerbaijan gave a self-confessed testimony. Tigran Abrahamyan

It is not the three former presidents who should go to the meeting with Pashinyan, but the investigators. Edgar Ghazaryan

He did not go out of his editor nature. Agassi Mikayelyan

Professional tasib, don't you have honor, until when will you be silent? Margarit Yesayan

There is systemic corruption in Armenia. Lilit Galstyan

There is no more cruel, low and immoral wall. Vladimir Martirosyan

Of course, Prime Minister Pashinyan continues his information-propaganda "jungling". Hakob Badalyan