"Fact" daily writes:
The "velvet revolutionary" government led by Pashinyan during the six and a half years of his tenure, apart from the biggest destructions, to be honest, has already deeply bored many people with his "revolutionary" innovations and rampages.
Apparently, the CP "elite" not only liked Orwell's famous anti-utopian work "1984", but they also took it as a guide for their activities. sees in actual action, on his own skin and at the expense of his own blood and lives, by the way. Surely, the government of the day liked the "elder brother is watching you" situation, when the state-party leadership had full opportunity to follow everyone indiscriminately in almost every pore.
Excited by that fantasy, you know, for example, they developed a package of drafts of the Law "On Amendments to the Law on Police" and related laws, which the Pashinyan faction adopted in the first reading. , and the Pashinyan police have full access to all that video surveillance data. In other words, Pashinyan wants in the country introduce round-the-clock video surveillance, video recording and recording of everyone.Official reasoning aside, the real intention is extremely transparent and obvious.
Well, if, let's say, a child in the senior group of the kindergarten says "Pashinyan is a bobo", he, along with his parents, can be plastered on the walls, spread on the asphalt, sent to prison, exiled, etc. by the red berets.
But, as always, they went too far, it seems that they have realized it, and now the Ministry of Internal Affairs announces that they are withdrawing the mentioned bill Although they "don't want to hit the ground again" and claim that the bill they developed was simply a magnificent, flawless, unparalleled thing. but, well, people didn't want it, they didn't want it.
The reality, we think, is a little different. It seems to us that this time the mentioned disgraceful bill, which is difficult to call anything other than the legalization of the destruction of human rights, has also been criticized by the Western sponsors and "grantors" of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. But this is only one example. And this example reminded me of another important issue. And how many such "revolutionary" and, most importantly, destructive "initiatives" have there been, how many "innovations" have there been, for example, in the fields of general education and university education.
Shall we mention the shameful situation in the textbook or the phantasmagoria of the "academic city"?
What is the state of Armenia's agriculture? The experts don't stop raising the alarm. The other one is the Ministry of Internal Affairs. And what did they do? what is the result, apart from the fact that the department led by Pashinyan's fellow countryman is over-inflated.
Well, let's give some more "innocent" examples of "velvet revolutionary" innovations.
