"Fact" daily writes:
For any country, the closure of strategic markets and economic restrictions that directly hit the local producer are a matter of national security and the survival of thousands of families. However, the statements made by Nikol Pashinyan during the briefing following the last session of the government, related to apricot export obstacles and perishable crops, were more like openly mocking and mocking his own people and businessmen.
The wording "whose house does not spoil apricots, it spoils in all of our houses, why does it become top news?" is nothing but openly and openly "being angry" at one's own voters, as well as non-voters. This is a direct blow to the people who believed in him, and now they are offered a simple formula. "For the sake of Pashinyan's political ambitions, you must stay hungry."
The head of the country, in fact, puts a sign of equality between two forgotten apricots in the refrigerator and tons of perishable, exportable crops, under which businessmen have loans, huge debts and worries about supporting families.
A situation is being created where the destructive price of Nikol Pashinyan's failed foreign policy and international relations has to be paid by the ordinary citizen with his daily bread and the worsening of the social situation, but it is presented by him personally as an ordinary, acceptable domestic topic.
Years of hard work, investments and logistics chains, which are broken due to the government's inaction, are reduced to the level of household "munnat" at Pashinyan's level.
This statement best shows how frivolous, irresponsible and superficial his approach is towards the state administration and the businessmen and citizens of his country in general. To what degree does he have an indifferent, even "indifferent" attitude towards the state of citizens, social security?
Here's what all this shows. How can the head of the country treat the catastrophe caused by economic sanctions as another "top news" and not a crisis that needs to be solved at the moment?
And that's not all. Therefore, with his "politics" he will spoil the relations with a country, more so with the Economic and Political Union (EMU), the producers of agricultural products, the businesses connected with it will be deprived of 98 percent of the market of their business activities without any alternative, but Pashinyan will come forward "munnat" to all those people or "adapt to new markets".
I would like to say: you, your product, come out as you want, what about me? It can be said that this is beyond "being a kaifavat". Moreover, when Nikol Pashinyan fails to ensure the safety and stability of his businessmen due to his own geopolitical adventure, and then mocks the losses suffered by those same people, it speaks of a complete lack of state thinking and exceptional cynicism.
This is a direct signal to the business that in the moment of crisis they will be completely alone, and he, at best, will explain on the TV screens: well, apricots are rotting at everyone's house, there is no need to make a tragedy out of it. By the way, first of all, it is not only about apricots. In reality, the picture is much more comprehensive and sad. We are talking about almost the entire range of agricultural products. tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, stone fruits (cherries, cherries), preferably the same apricots, plus peaches. More so, the flowers.
And since they are especially strong in "marketing", they brag that they exported 5,000 flowers here, 10,000 flowers there. Even the information that, let's say, exporting those 10,000 flowers to another country has nothing to do with the government, the businessman had made such a deal much earlier. But really, even that doesn't matter.
What is important is that as a result of the policy of the head of the government, an entire sector has been deprived of the market, which sells about 95 million flowers annually. Despite the self-confession of being "lame in mathematics", they should at least be able to count. Compare a few thousand and 95 million.
The same about apricots, cherries, in general, non-exported and spoiled, also perishable fruits and vegetables. And this is not even all. Pashinyan is already "blaming" farmers, farmers, businessmen, or are you playing with our sovereignty with your low-quality product?
Like this? What does he want to say? that until now low-quality goods were supplied to traditional markets, let's say Russia? A question arises. First of all, why didn't such problems arise before, if they did, then they were rare cases that were quickly resolved, and then, what are the relevant state structures of Armenia for, which should carry out control and whose leaders, let's note, as civil servants, receive quite a few bonuses in addition to salaries? Or is he still looking for new "scapegoats" for the relationship ruined by his fault?
As in all previous cases. We have said it, let's say it again, one day you will wake up and see that Pashinyan will put all the blame for all these disasters and problems (also expected) in the "pockets" of the people.
It has been on that way for a long time...
Details in today's issue of "Past" daily.
