"Hraparak" newspaper writes:
"In the discussion of the Prosecutor General of the Prosecutor General of the Prosecutor's Prosecutor for Determining Arthur Sargsyan, the Prosecutor General of the Bishop Artur Sargsyan, which testified that the Prosecutor General was only committed to Pashinyan, having even on the formal procedures of legality.
When the parliament was discussed for two consecutive days in a row, the petition to deprive Sargsyan of immunity should be followed by the motion to detain. But the CPI members decided in the session hall, in the presence of the Prosecutor General, should be voted not only on the issue of deprivation of immunity, but also not yet discussed, detention.
This was announced by the podium, the Prosecutor General, without changing the mimic of the face, followed the legal absurdity, and thought it would be refused to vote for that disgrace.
Only Hovik Aghazaryan, an expedited from the CP, did not make two voting, perhaps the parliament does not give an agreement to deprive him of immunity, and it becomes meaningless to vote. Aghazaryan hinted that everything is in advance that you are doing one discussion and one voting.
Ruben Rubinyan, then the prosecutor, had to agree with Aghazaryan's remarks and proposal. "
