Euromedia24 on Play Store Euromedia24 on App Sore
BNB

$652.73

BTC

$106558

ADA

$0.56263

ETH

$2455.81

SOL

$149.15

26 °

Yerevan

12 °

Moscow

41 °

Dubai

29 °

London

31 °

Beijing

32 °

Brussels

23 °

Rome

29 °

Madrid

BNB

$652.73

BTC

$106558

ADA

$0.56263

ETH

$2455.81

SOL

$149.15

26 °

Yerevan

12 °

Moscow

41 °

Dubai

29 °

London

31 °

Beijing

32 °

Brussels

23 °

Rome

29 °

Madrid

Who and how did the consensus over the impeachment? "Fact"

The "Fact" daily writes:


The Primate of the Diocese of Shirak Mikael Ajapahyan has been arrested for several days, and the Impeachment process could be deadlocked again. Armenia's party leader Edmon Marukyan stated that independent NA independent deputies Hovik Aghazaryan and Hakob Aslanyan nominated the Prime Minister to Mikael Archbishop Ajapahyan.


In his turn, the NA "Armenia" faction announced that it joined Ajahyan's candidacy with all 28 signatures. The faction of "I have the honor" faction also announced a little later, and, in fact, there was a signature of 36 NA deputies, which was enough to present the impeachment issue to the parliament.


Holy Mikael was then in the Investigative Committee, which assumed its defense, former chairman of the Advocacy Chamber Ara Zohrabyan, former Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan.


The above-mentioned events quickly followed the Bishop Mikael's statement, which was posted on his Facebook page. "I am fully satisfied with my service as a clergyman, so please do not keep my name among the prime ministerial candidates."


At that time, the media reported that Zohrabyan and Tatoyan persuaded the sacred to appear in the field, and then advised not to enter the impeachment process. As a result, the facturely failed and the most vivid version of the impeachment.


At the same time, the option of nominating the Prime Minister's candidate at that moment was the only one who had the support of the NA "Armenia" factions, as well as the independent two deputies. Consider it. After all, many other figures have been talking about it for a long time, and the Hayaker initiative had formulated a public demand. Moreover, the candidate himself did not seem to be against such a development.


In May last year, the Bishop Mikael interviewed "Aravot". To the question, if you are offered to be a candidate for prime minister, you will agree, he answered. "I have not been responsible for any responsibility, but if it blesses the Catholicos of All Armenians.


Without the blessing of the Catholicos of All Armenians, we will not do anything, self-lam. " "If he bless His Holiness, you will take that responsibility," he said. "If the Patriarch of All Armenians bless, I will be under any responsibility, although it is crucifixion, but one must be crucified, after all, or not."


Ara Zohrabyan made extensive post on his Facebook page and noted: "His Holiness accuses himself of calling for the seizure of the government. Holy Mikael says I have not made such calls for prohibited by the Criminal Code. And in parallel with this process, Holy President wants to be a candidate for the Prime Minister and received his consent.


Even the answers to the journalists' question were already presented to the court to justify the detention mediation. Both the Church and Michael want to connect Bagrat to the Bishop's case to show that you may see the Church forcibly want to change the government in that light. "


In fact, Ara Zohrabyan does not deny that he and Tatoyan have given such counseling to His Holiness. However, the reasoning could work, if we were dealing with the pursuit of the pure legal process and the authorities, the importance of legal-political logic. However, the fact is that both Bagrat's Bishop's "coup duty plan" or the accusation of sacred to Michael has a political context, and the steps of these authorities are out of legal logic.


And in this case, it is impossible to apply the absolute legal tool of protection, excluding political. On the contrary, Archbishop Michael Ajapahyan has elected a constitutional path to a change of government in his interview or not, but at the moment the fact that Tatoyan and Zohrabyan has become actually actually actually. The failure of the impeachment process. In short, whatever it happened, the fact remains that two influential figures are in solitary confinement, and the experience of impeachment has failed. After all, who, how and why did the hardly established consensus over the impeachment, time will tell?

News

Eadaily. G7 countries have called on Iran and Israel to maintain ceasefire
Important
Papoyan continues to spread the wrong data. Wage information is incorrect. FIP.am:
The design works of the "Ajapnyak" station of the metro are completely completed
Turkey has said that there is no deadline for organizing a summit of leaders on Ukraine
Megan Markle in the scandal's focus on not invited to the wedding
Sweden will provide $ 180 million to support Kiev at the expense of assistance to other countries
Lukashenko stated that Belarus will give a tough response to any aggressive attack
Maria Sharapova and David Beckham meeting in Wimbledon
WSJ. US and Israeli strikes can force Iran to develop nuclear weapons
Important
The Investigation Committee has found out the source of the fake recording attributed to Nikol Pashinyan
Trump signed an executive decree canceling sanctions on Syria
Denmark has taken over the presidency of the EU Council for six months
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Cuba called the new tightening of US sanctions a crime
Turkey raises the cost of transit of ships with bosday and descent strait
Iran does not believe that negotiations with the United States will resume soon
Important
"If darion Nersisyan did not leave the Cathedible, we will remove each other brotherly." Pashinyan, the married priests
Ilo Mask calls for a new political party
Associated Press. Trump will host Netanyahu at the White House on July 7
Afghan delegation has arrived in Qatar to participate in the work of UN working groups
Charles III has decided to give up the royal train