The "Fact" daily writes:
In more than 7 years of government management, a political environment has been formed, the primary driving force of which has become the agenda of hatred and hostility.
Since the beginning of Pashinyan's rule, the government's pointing guilty has been to the blame for their failures to make their failures on others, not on inclusion, dialogue, consolidation, but a deeply divisive, intolerance, and manipules. By the cost of completely loss. On the one hand, such an approach allows you to avoid the content of specific issues, and on the other hand, the authorities gives the authorities an opportunity to keep their own supporters in a constant threat.
But the government's propaganda managed to hold dividing lines within the public that it had caused a wider social division. As a result, public life has become a permanent suspicion, division and intolerance environment where a small incident can turn into serious contradiction or violence. In other words, the phenomena of obliviation are also projected at the individual level.And we have repeatedly witnessed a small disagreement or dispute between people violence and tragic consequences.
Not only do the discussion platforms close, but also the votes of experts, intellectuals and sectoral specialists are silenced. And when criticism is criticized against any legislative or other initiative, it immediately meets the labeling wave. The critic is called "former", "disruptive", "racist", "Fifth column", etc. As a result, the field of public discussion is in Amayan, but also the state system is cleared of any difference, turning only to the mechanism leading and blindly leading and blindly.
And without pluralism, without the circulation of knowledge, the state policy without occupational analysis is becoming a dilapidated chronic noise, in which there is no public content.
High-position officials can allow themselves today not only vulgar, street language thinking, but also to "close to the people", as they want to make public circulation, moreover, to make the public as a consumer and applicant.
Or at least the field of such, as it cannot be said that there are no melting people in our society and such a level, "dogma". When an official begins to speak like a hero of "Bepedka" or low-quality TV series, it affects the public awareness, lowering the overall language and the decent language as "unfit", and the street vocabulary as "actual".
If in the past the head of state or other high-ranking official came up with such a vocabulary, it would immediately come to the column of dishonor, but now it is different, "something has changed." The public value system has been so degraded that the vulgar and curse vocabulary was simply attractive to some people. And such a vicious trend is especially encouraged in social networks. Becoming a public "serious" face. And in fact, the main goal is to increase this "audience".
On the other hand, the lie, Manipul Races and the rumors depending on the air have become a public category. More popules is the word in which the lie prevails. And there are conditions that people tend to be more likely to lie and myths than the truth. This fall of the value of speech not only destroys the possibility of increasing content issues, but the other important feature of the public discourse is generally dismissed that the other important feature of this authorities is that the benchmark is constantly reduced.
If there are still reforms, they are not solving the issue of increasing efficiency. And in the case of staff appointments, it becomes clear that education is not only a priority, but often considered a disruptive factor. People can experience strategic positions without serious educational preparations without serious educational preparations, only as a result of political considerations.
The authorities on the topic of education are constantly building, saying it is fashionable, but in reality the state has no pursuit of educational policy, which often only deepen the crisis.
The government's media platforms mostly present a synthetic reality, where they try to cover real problems with false optimism and demonstration scenes. From that propaganda terror, there may be problems that there are no problems in Armenia, we live in an ideal country where people are satisfied, and the government is improving every issue.
The reality, of course, is completely different, growing poverty, inflation, unemployment, depreciable institutions, and the deepest value of depreciation is a systemic campaign against the pillars of statehood. First of all, the army is discredited, being regularly submitted as a corrupt and inefficient structure, which can only be turned into border troops under the name of the professional army.
It is no coincidence that "Deertia" is encouraged in the context that you can pay money and serve less in the army. The actual army is discredited, being considered as a structure where you need to avoid serving as much as possible. Moreover, it is considered "punishment."
On the other hand, the Church targets the Church as a "unholy" structure, which should not play a role in public life. In other words, the big role that the Church had in the self-preservation of the Armenian people is simply zero. And one of the tendencies of the attack on the church is the context that it is not considered as an institution of resignation, reducing the heroes, the idea of peace, and the concept of peace.
And there is one basic idea in the center of this whole political regime, maintaining government at any cost, even if dignity, education, institutionalism, public solidarity and the future of their own homeland are finally sacrificed.
Arsen Sahakyan
