The "Fact" daily writes:
Surprisingly, if we do not say, when it comes to famous historical situations, it's not or not for example, for example, Napoleon had a spherical class during the Battle of Manazkert.
When new students with new families with the subject are doing such "if". When some fantasmothers invent such "alternative history" to such "if", they think, they are idle, they have been affected by some TV series, and so on, you pass.
But when people with a completely mature, even some scientific degrees come from such as "If", they begin to build theories and "ideology", so the thing has passed, and it cannot be silent.
No, history "revisionism" is not a new phenomenon. But in our case, this is not just "revisionism". Referring, Nikol Pashinyan thought, as saying, "by the opposite side", "the opposite side" could write. And it is probably this approach, which has been written in that approach.
But when the "fantasies" of the Fanthane is being sitting in the post of Prime Minister, "ideology" is becoming a disaster.
It is characteristic that Pashinyan and his various prominent preachers consistently focus their historical realities, they begin to question the famous or absurd accusations of hundreds, even thousands of years ago.
Methodology is basically the same. For example, they take any "episode", it is possible, even fictitious, it is grossly cutting from historical and political context, and then they start with the combination of modern realities.
The same "punctuation" is flooded by various accusations, for example, 120 years ago on this or the decision of the ARF Dashnaktsutyun or the list of 1.5 million victims of the Armenian Genocide. It is also very important that the "velvet" chance is much more important than the Artsakh movement.
And the main one is as follows. Instead, Pashinyan and the CPA rejoicing how Artsakh was denied, as the self-proclaimed state of Artsakh was killed, as the 149,000 population of Artsakh made it frowned and homeless, they brought some "if".
In this case, some declaration, 1991, and they are trying to break on it, on the former, on Russia, and the people of 1991. The declaration "Artsakh, the issue of Artsakh and its settlement were discussed aside.
This is just one of the examples.
And it seems to some that, all the issues were exhausted. Let's say so. Some are widowed. And the falsification of historical realities is large, with a large scale. Right. Whose expansion, if you do not prevent it, it can become a reality. Yes, and if we listen to some government preachers, let's make sure that hundreds of thousands of Armenians have been killed in the Patriotic War.
It is a familiar frasse, isn't it? By the way, the "fashion" of education closely connected to the above-mentioned phenomenon. When you follow the main speakers of these "traveling liquard" Nikol Pashinyan's statements, what is the "lectures" of government sittings?
By and large, what he said is aimed at all possible values, perceptions, all merits. "
Yes, of course, the Garni temple is "Havabu", according to Pashinyan's ... And in general, according to Pashinyan's "ideology" where bread, there is there.
In other words, Armenians live exclusively only to fill the stomach, a purely biological organism, and the end. You know, it is possible to go only one place to identity, to the illness.
There is such a sayence that history is resolving revenge when you do not learn it. But let us be noticed that history can also take revenge when you break it.
Armen Hakobyan
