"Although the Foreign Intelligence Service in its report does not consider the probability of a large-scale military operation against Armenia to be high, the factors presented as a threat in the analysis speak of the opposite," said Tigran Abrahamyan, deputy of the "I have honor" faction of the National Assembly.
"Starting from the delay of the negotiations pointed out in the report, which is formulated as a deepening of uncertainties, to the discourse formed against the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Armenia: "Zangezur Corridor", "Western Azerbaijan", "Militarization of Armenia", "Revanchism". It is true in the report. it said the service was still investigating whether the speech was being used as a basis for "legitimacy" in resuming the war, or no, but it is clear that in this case the threat is recorded, it is just an attempt not to present the situation in a more misleading way.
By the way, at the same time, in contrast to a large number of figures of the ruling elite, who in general rule out or consider the resumption of war unlikely, the Secretary of the Security Council also spoke about the current threats, pointing to the rhetoric coming from Azerbaijan, the purchase of new and large-scale weapons and active military exercises.
From the speech of the Security Council Secretary and the report of the Foreign Intelligence Service, one can get the impression that although the RA government consistently implements the agenda set by Azerbaijan, the military-political situation continues to contain significant threats and deepening uncertainties," he wrote.
