It then reiterates its demand for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages." But U.S. officials said the wording was not tough enough because it did not make the cease-fire conditional on the release of the hostages. Wood insisted the resolution's authors refused to consider a compromise. the wording that could have led to its adoption, noting also that it contains "Hamas' responsibility for the October 7 terrorist attack There was no condemnation." Only the US voted against the resolution, using its right to veto one of the council's five permanent members. The other four permanent members voted in favor of the resolution, including the UK, which had earlier abstained from the US vote. to the other three rejected cease-fire resolutions. Before the vote, Israeli Ambassador Dani Danon declared that approving the resolution would be "treasonous".