"Fact" daily writes:
Pashinyan and the 50 caps continue their pre-election campaign. The fact that it is a gross violation of election laws and rules is confirmed by many experts, but we will look at it separately.
In this case, we and, we are sure, many people are interested in why Nikol Pashinyan reacts so aggressively and nervously to people who ask him various questions or even make some requests in different settlements.
Accordingly, there is no big difference in terms of Pashinyan's aggressive behavior, whether a citizen or someone asks him to give his child some small position or remarks that the Catholicos is not a minister to be appointed or dismissed at Pashinyan's whim. It doesn't matter whether a person asks to build something in their village or reminds about Artsakh.
Before moving on to other observations, an important note should be made. It is understandable that people who are most loyal to Nikol Pashinyan gather or are "brought" to the "regional meetings" with Nikol Pashinyan, if not to say, supporters who have a positive attitude towards him.
It is unlikely that people who turn off the TV or change the channel when they see Pashinyan have a particular desire to see him again. And the remarkable thing is that this also annoys Pashinyan. In the sense that even the representatives of his electorate who have a positive attitude towards him, so to speak, raise questions.
And Pashinyan is already counting on "his" voters. He gets angry at them, gets angry, waves his hands. Do you remember when they just came to power, they kept saying: "leave it, let us work" or "leave it, let them work"?
In eight years, that is, now, they have reached the point of "well, leave it, let it piss off". By the way, about getting angry. A little more domestic behavior. In general, one could hardly expect anything other than what we see from Nikol Pashinyan.
For 8 years since he has been the Prime Minister, Pashinyan has behaved like this, both in the National Assembly and at government meetings, when responding to counter-speakers or when answering "dark questions" at press conferences, and when addressing the questions of opposition MPs.
His public behavior is characterized by irregular and unbalanced gesticulation, irregular shouting, obscene vocabulary. To save the space of the newspaper and the nerves of the readers, let's not mention them one by one.
The disgraceful record of the "uncle" alone would have been enough for any other figure to resign not only from his position but also from politics under public pressure. Convenient. Now we see the same behavior during Pashinyan's pre-election campaign, mainly during meetings with his own supporters.
Such a stable impression is being formed that Pashinyan gets out of the campaign bus only to shout at Maralik residents, Ijevan residents, Artik residents and others, get angry, and make his head hurt. Why?
Above all, it is a manifestation of distrust of the given individual, Pashinyan. By the way, when we compare it with the results of their published and obviously "inflated survey", the contrast is even more striking.
According to that "survey", Pashinyan is supposedly the "sole leader" in the political field. But solo leaders don't behave like that, so insecure, so fired up, so aggressive. Second, Pashinyan sees wonderfully with his experience that people have long since lacked trust and respect for him.
He sees before anyone else that the only thing that people, in this case his few supporters, have in seeing him is to gain some personal or group benefit. In other words, they are also unhappy.
And when the bubble of fiction meets the thorns of reality, it immediately bursts. The cameras capture it impartially, and everyone sees the explosions of those bubbles, which are accompanied by Pashinyan's vocal outbursts.
Pashinyan and CP have also remained under the propaganda myths they invented. As if "nothing had been done for 30 years", Pashinyan came, and the flowers bloomed, the swamps disappeared, the deserts were watered, the barren trees yielded crops, even the Sun began to rise in the morning and set in the evening.
And the people, the "three million prime ministers" instead of being grateful to him, jumping up at the sight of him, slaughtering the last sheep at his feet, they still ask silent questions, complain, remind about Artsakh, about the Catholicos... Oh, oh, oh, what gratitude. Pashinyan also flares up.
Instantly. Folklore has an apt definition: "Zakat made fight". Pashinyan's behavior reminds of that phrase. Perhaps he felt that he was living in the environment of his fakes, "boss, everything is fine" reporting subordinates or close hoodlums, while it is not so.
The ideologue of "Real Armenia" faced the real Armenia, and could not stand it, his nerves gave way. And the real Armenia is significantly different from what is pouring out from the government's propaganda media and the statements of the government's propagandists.
And the gap between reality itself and Pashinyan's "reality" is so huge that even Pashinyan sees it and begins to be impatient.
And it seems that we have done this or that, as if they did it with money brought from "someone else's house", as if it is heroism, not something normal. Moreover, if some things were even done, they are insignificant compared to the destruction they caused. Pashinyan's government has not reduced poverty, it has continuously promised, but it has not opened any normal jobs, it has put the country and its people under serious threats, it has caused war and the death of thousands of boys, they have renounced Artsakh and handed it over to the enemy, they have gone on a campaign to destroy the Armenian Apostolic Church, and... after all this, they want no questions asked of them?
Seriously? Oh, by the way, don't spoil people's curtains, it's a pity. They don't get paid in millions unlike caps.
ARMEN HAKOBYAN
Details in today's issue of "Past" daily.
