The "Fact" daily writes:
One of the components of the Government of the Republic of Armenia 2021-2025 referred to agriculture, in the private compensation of the cost of subsidizing interest and intensive garden. Lately, various opinions have been heard that the main beneficiaries of this program are large landowners, some names are also mentioned. In fact, do the villagers suffer only the major landowners?
The point is that, conventionally, it is impossible to implement the programs on the area of 1000 square meters, in which the subsidies should be provided. No one can simply provide appropriate infrastructure on such a plot. The real goal is to provide greater efficiency by enlargement. According to our information, many villagers are able to earn a daily basis, not 1-2 months, but the head of the experts. "Unfortunately, we have such an executive power that just says hi, you realize that it will be wrong in that good. Since the executive has the feature of making an arbitrary project that comes, the first thing they want to do is give a negative assessment, "Pipoyan said.
He notes that it was not a secret that the condition of agriculture would deteriorate in our country with a specific example. "Grandpa had a great land, he left his land to three sons, and that land had already shrunk three times, and then each of his sons had left their two or three sons, and had twice short. Now a generation changes, and the large plot of land turned into small pieces. One develops, does not cultivate next door, and there is no effective management in small space.
Needed to do so as to occur. Zooms could be done in two ways, to allow everyone to come, or smaller, or the small business is unable to find a calm business, and the smaller they have simply become a matter of business, because he is no longer a partner, but a servant.
But in reality, the culprit is not the villagers, but a policy that has not been able to pursue a policy that is also to be able to enter the game, on the other hand, the villager will come true, and he has a stable income. "We live in a reality where the rich people do not like the capital creator. It is not an invested system that will have a component of social justice in a certain sense. The Scandinavian countries are different. If you work a lot, you pay a lot of tax if you work a little, I have little tax.
When the extreme poor side sees the extreme rich, of course, society is polarized, enmity over capital. Now the state must have a mind and behave so that it does not cause enmity towards capital, and the capital creates good. The villages must live, there should be money there, but that money should flow so that the villager will not be nervous, but rejoice.
The state should be able to pursue a policy on the one hand to run away, saying that, on the other hand, it is not dissatisfied, saying that the problem is not zoomed, but it is that the major is participating here, but the fact that they are not. able to develop a methodology that everyone will be inclusive or not to participate in Khoshor is not a problem.
