"Fact" daily writes:
You will have noticed that Nikol Pashinyan, especially during the last 1 year and especially in the last weeks, is resorting to a rather primitive manipulative trick more and more often.
When expressing himself on any topic, according to which it does not matter which topic, he characterizes the circumstances that contradict his approach in any way as ""testifying to the non-existence of the state".
There are many examples. For example, he talks about Aragats, contrasting it with Ararat, then adding that "whoever talks about Ararat, talks about the non-existence of the state".
Or, for example, he refers to the famous song "Gini Litz" (the song glorifying the vengeful act of punishing Talaat, one of the perpetrators of the Armenian Genocide, and Soghomon Tehleryan, who carried it out), notes that the volunteer who punished the perpetrator... is anti-state.
He says, "Western Armenia is against the state. He says that he is talking about the non-existence of the army. Recently, for example, the expression "dirty salary" fell under that manipulation. By "dirty salary" we mean the nominal salary including taxes.
Pashinyan says that it is an anti-state perception. In practice, the fundamental document of the Republic of Armenia, the Declaration of Independence, was also accused of being against the state.
In other words, according to Pashinyan's distorted perception, the "opposite side of the country" version, the Declaration of Independence... is against the existence of statehood.
Soon, most likely, he will announce that whoever, say, spoke about apricots, he spoke about the non-existence of the state.
By some "strange" coincidence, all those symbolic, substantive and fundamental circumstances, phenomena, factors that emphasize national identity, which are essential components of national identity identification, moreover, are emphases fixed in the fundamental document of the state, according to Pashinyan, "are about the non-existence of the state ".
In that case, the question arises, what is the "existence of the state"? And again, who is talking about what? Pashinyan has been subjecting the state to disasters and fatal trials for more than 6 years and throwing it into tragedies and troubles. , defines what is about the existence of the state and what is about the non-existence?
In fact, if there is something inside our country, a phenomenon that is about the "non-existence of the state", it is Pashinyan's false agendas, Pashinyan's government and the group gathered around him.
