A protest was filed against Davit Galstyan's decision to detain Artsakh MP Davit Galstyan. Defenders Slavik Poghosyan and Artak Navasardyan made a statement.
"On June 25 2025, on Davit Galstyan, Article 43-308, Part 1 of the RA Criminal Code (Preparation of Terrorism) has been initiated by public criminal prosecution, and the latter has been accused of the content of the RA Investigation Committee on the content of 25.06.25.
Both charges or d. During the trial of the mediation of the mediation of the mediation of the mediation of the petition submitted by the pre-trial body to Galstyan, the defense has argued that D. The accusation against Galstyan is uncertain, it is not clear and clear from the factual description of the accusation or d. Galstyan is attributed to what specific action (s), which could be described as a preparation for terrorism or authority. D. The accusation submitted to Galstyan has not been determined, the essence of the accusation has not been properly clarified, which should be considered a violation of the protection of protection and protection rights.
D. The study of the imposition of the imposition of the petition to Galstyan has not been discussed twice a year after March 3, 2025, while the organization of illegal, including the accusation, to organize or implement any action. In general, there was no factual information in the materials attached to the motion that would have caused the impartial observer to convince that D. Galstyan may have participated in the planning of the alleged actions, organization or at least aware of them. Therefore, it was absent from D. The condition of a precautionary measure against Galstyan, including the condition of the legal condition for applying, is a well-founded suspicion.
Meanwhile, the first instance of the first instance of Yerevan city, simply reference to their relevance, without indicating the fact that there are evidence of a reasonable doubt, there are facts and evidence at this stage of the exam. Galstyan has anything to do with the alleged crime to be attributed to it, making a decision to meet the mediation of the preliminary investigation body. In other words, the decision of the Court of First Instance reflects the necessary and sufficient factual basis, which does not reflect the process of documents for assessment, facts and the process of establishing the law. Therefore, D. also violated. The rights of Galstyan's personal freedom and immunity, as well as the reasoned judicial act.
Let us also inform you that a special review complaint has been filed against the above-mentioned decision of the Civil Court of First Instance of Yerevan, "the statement said.
