"The prosecutor's office has files in all similar cases. They make their analysis with certain Excel files. At this point or that, they are provided to both the court and the respondent. At the March 7 court hearing, we raised the issue. The representative of the Prosecutor's Office promised to take a month, and after the regular session of the Federation of Football Federation of Armenia, Ruben Hayrapetyan's representative Vahagn Dallakyan told the referendum of the Armenian Football Federation (FFA).
The latter mentioned the settlement file with the postal delivery they had a week to get acquainted with all the time. On the occasion, they expressed their position on the property of the property, which to recalculate and significantly reduce the claim, if not a solid foundation for refusal to refuse in general. "Several court hearings were postponed for that reason. The prosecutor's office said they were working in the direction of recount, and it is very possible that the subject of the lawsuit is made. We were waiting for the recalculation and the change of the lawsuit, but it became clear at the previous court hearing that they have no recalculations, they do not refuse the lawsuit, "said the subject," said Vahagn Dallakyan.
The latter reminded that in one of the previous court hearings, they presented a motion to suspend the proceedings, because the score of the highly qualified property was based on the extract of "Armeconombank", which did not correspond to reality.
"This statement showed that there was no turnover in the bank account of one of the companies, but we had original receipts preserved from Armeconombank, which show very large turnovers. And based on false learning, the prosecutor's office was illegally qualified in 2001-2004. About $ 4 billion in revenue, and further income arising from it was also evaluated during the next years. We have submitted a report on this. Criminal proceedings have been initiated. But we have not yet reached any results. We petitioned to suspend the proceedings in today's case on this basis. The court did not satisfy the motion, "Vahagn Dallakyan said.
